<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mafia Spammers (the cheekiest spammer ever?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fromthefrontend.co.uk/2007/10/10/mafia-spammers-the-cheekiest-spammer-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fromthefrontend.co.uk/2007/10/10/mafia-spammers-the-cheekiest-spammer-ever/</link>
	<description>Interviews, reviews, tips and news about (x)html, CSS, Graphics, Hacks, Browsers, Tools and of course Webstandards.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Capri</title>
		<link>http://www.fromthefrontend.co.uk/2007/10/10/mafia-spammers-the-cheekiest-spammer-ever/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Capri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fromthefrontend.co.uk/2007/10/10/mafia-spammers-the-cheekiest-spammer-ever/#comment-492</guid>
		<description>Yes, that "spammer's friend" is really pathetic. I found about him on my Google alerts about a month ago, apparently this twit is still at it.

My cheeky comment back to this Richard reject goes as follows:

No deal, Rick, dude! I'm not spamming my own site with your link, and I don't want anyone telling me what to put on my sites for any reason or in exchange for anything. And if you know a lot of spammers and personally can contact them, then why the heck aren't you really doing something to help isps rid the internet of them? Doesn't say much for your own character, does it, hmmmm?

You're a spammer yourself, and if anything, in competition with the others.

Besides, if I refuse to put your lousy link up on my site, you could always do the opposite of what you promise and actually spam on your own or get other spammers to spam, which I have full confidence you would be petty enough to do.

So forget it, I'm not buying that load of rotten potatoes from you.

I'll just laugh at your pathetic attempt at boosting your ego by trying to get the highest rankings in search engines. You have no life. I suggest you get one, quick!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that &#8220;spammer&#8217;s friend&#8221; is really pathetic. I found about him on my Google alerts about a month ago, apparently this twit is still at it.</p>
<p>My cheeky comment back to this Richard reject goes as follows:</p>
<p>No deal, Rick, dude! I&#8217;m not spamming my own site with your link, and I don&#8217;t want anyone telling me what to put on my sites for any reason or in exchange for anything. And if you know a lot of spammers and personally can contact them, then why the heck aren&#8217;t you really doing something to help isps rid the internet of them? Doesn&#8217;t say much for your own character, does it, hmmmm?</p>
<p>You&#8217;re a spammer yourself, and if anything, in competition with the others.</p>
<p>Besides, if I refuse to put your lousy link up on my site, you could always do the opposite of what you promise and actually spam on your own or get other spammers to spam, which I have full confidence you would be petty enough to do.</p>
<p>So forget it, I&#8217;m not buying that load of rotten potatoes from you.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll just laugh at your pathetic attempt at boosting your ego by trying to get the highest rankings in search engines. You have no life. I suggest you get one, quick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
